To begin: I’m no one
important. As it is easy to see, I
barely write on my own website, let alone anywhere impressive like
Newsweek. So who am I to question
someone who does? Nobody. But yet I will, for myself, because I read an
article this week that annoyed me so much that I decided to start writing here
again. I felt that compelled to rage
into the abyss.
In the February 2, 2016, issue of Newsweek, there is an
article titled “Hello From the Safe Side.”
In it, writer Kevin Maney argues: “Digital technology is killing great
music in favor of familiar formulas.” In
fact, “technology is making sure that from now on we get a boatload of Adeles
but never again the likes of David Bowie.”
Oh. Really now?
The author quotes a fellow named Andy Gershon. “Adele is selling a huge amount to soccer
moms, but is it having an impact on the culture? Not really . . . artists like David Bowie
can’t get the momentum to have a career live David Bowie.”
I take issue with the “soccer mom” crap. Several mothers I know—ones who drive
minivans, shuttle their children to after-school activities, bake delicious
vegan, gluten-free, nut-free, sugar-free, dairy-free cookies from scratch—like
Bowie. They like him without irony and
without remorse for their childfree days and without apology to the men who
apparently think they own Bowie.
Yet I know other mothers (those similarly inclined to watch
tiny, horrible athletes because they love them) who like Adele. Or probably Josh Groban (my particular brand
of kryptonite). That Gershon chap, and
maybe Maney by extension, insults both Adele and her fans by implying that both
are somehow less because of who they are.
Adele is less because soccer moms . . . or lets just say it—women . . .
like her. Women are less because
obviously their tastes are so unsophisticated that they are easily duped into
buying the same thing over and over again.
Thus, Gershon says, there will never be another Bowie. Because the stupid sheep out in the pasture want
the sanguine, the bland, the commercial.
Streaming music offers all this and more to us sheep, so you can bet
your mom jeans that all those edgy boys making the real music won’t see the
light of day. The culture will suffer
because boundary-pushing acts won’t rise above the fray. Because Adele.
Please. Just
stop. The proliferation of instantly
available content in many of the arts makes it difficult for anyone to have a
huge, culture-shaping career other than a chosen few. But hasn’t this long been the case? The fact is that no one can be like Bowie
because he was one of a kind. I mean,
the man pulled off Labyrinth. Has anyone
else pulled off Labyrinth? Could they? No. And that’s neither Adele nor streaming
music’s fault. It’s because people like David Bowie just don’t come around that often.
What the argument in this article turns out to be, then, is
that real music (the music these men like) is too edgy to rise to prominence
now. Too ahead of its time. Too
complicated and rich and cool and mind-bending that your mom just can’t
understand you it.
It couldn’t possibly be that Adele is popular because she
works hard on her craft and showmanship and makes music that connects with
people or speaks to them where they are in their lives. It couldn’t possibly be that Taylor Swift
sings from her heart and people like that.
It’s obviously because girls and women are dumb and just don’t get
Bowie.
If you quit writing because your books will never sell, you
aren’t really a writer. If a musician
gives up because he thinks he won’t be rich, because the only people getting
rich are Adele and Taylor Swift? Then
he isn't in it for real, either. Now
is the time where there is even more chance for artists to get discovered. Make money and have the platform like David
Bowie? Maybe not. But that’s not technology’s fault. There just isn’t that many people who do
that, ever.
Gentlemen of the Newsweek article, feel free to join all the
generations past who complain that these kids today don’t get your sound. Just please leave the moms out of it next
time.
No comments:
Post a Comment